Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Fiona Ferro vs Emiliana Arango Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ferro vs Arango analysis and find out who is favored!
Fiona Ferro vs Emiliana Arango Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ferro has won 48.67% of points on his second serve, while Arango has won 38.19%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ferro, in recent form, has won 57.7% of his opponent's second serve points, while Arango has won 54.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.69% and 41.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ferro has saved 52.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Arango has saved 51.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ferro has won 57.38% of matches played (W/L 35/ 26), with Arango winning 53.23% (W/L 33/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ferro has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 201/ 130), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9). Arango has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Ferro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 27/ 18), where as Arango has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 10/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ferro has played against opponents with an average rank of 250.13 while Arango has played against players with an average rank of 217.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ferro has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Arango has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ferro has converted 45.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Arango has converted 43.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ferro 0 - 0 Arango
149
Rank
39
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
118
Rank
109
High
23
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
56% (307-245)
Career Total W/L
59% (203-142)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
42% (11-15)
$1,390,722
Career Prize Money
$170,639
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Fiona Ferro | Emiliana Arango |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 42% (11/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (33/24) | 40% (23/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (274/252) | 46% (237/282) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) | 40% (4/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 45% (5/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 22 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 49 | 98 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:14 | 1:41:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 281.04 | 216.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1159/1764) | 70% (1259/1801) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (697/1159) | 57% (714/1259) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (296/605) | 38% (207/542) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (98/215) | 43% (102/236) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (785/1728) | 46% (821/1784) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 60% (6/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 43% (3/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 25% (2/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 42% (10/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 18% (2/11) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (15/11) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (15/4) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 18% (17/3) |
Fiona Ferro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Fiona Ferro
Player
Cristina Bucsa
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Fiona Ferro
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alize Cornet
Player
Fiona Ferro
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
30%
(
8 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Lauren Davis
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Fiona Ferro
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
75%
(
67 of
89)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Fiona Ferro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Timea Babos
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Manon Leonard
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Fiona Ferro
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Fiona Ferro
75%
(
74 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 6-7(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Emiliana Arango Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Emiliana Arango
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
47
Total Points Won
38
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Emiliana Arango
75%
(
62 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Emiliana Arango
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Astra Sharma
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Emiliana Arango
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
77%
(
84 of
109)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
45%
(
26 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
55%
(
52 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
98
Total Points Won
106
|
0-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Amanda Anisimova
76%
(
71 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
99)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
26%
(
6 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Greetje Minnen
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
73 of
97)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emiliana Arango
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Emiliana Arango
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
53 of
68)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ferro Vs Arango Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Fiona Ferro
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
